, 2. At the same time, independent of the truth or falsity of the premises, the deductive inference itself (the process of "connecting the dots" from premise to conclusion) is either valid or invalid. In logic, we often refer to the two broad methods of reasoning as the deductive and inductive approaches. In applied linguistics research, abductive reasoning is starting to be used as an alternative explanation to inductive reasoning, in recognition of anticipated outcomes of qualitative inquiry playing a role in shaping the direction of analysis. A syllogism yields a false conclusion if either of its propositions is false. All work is written to order. Greater the surface area, smaller the volume. Conclusion: the disorder will then grow or increase in my bedroom unless I clean or exclude it. Deduction allows deriving b as a consequence of a (deriving the consequences of what is assumed).[1]. The main difference between the two methods is the approach to research. Hence, Louise speaks both Dutch and French. To prove that hypothesis seen to be logical we need to measure form and then we need to measure energy efficiency. The terms “Fact,” “Rule” and “Case” are nicknames for the propositions that would be called the “conclusion” (C), “major premise” (MP) and “minor premise” (mp) respectively, in the simplest form of deductive syllogism. All inferences are not of the same range or variety. Quantitative research is most commonly linked or associated with Deductive approach. Final results, which are conclusions follow logically from the provided initial premises. As a matter of fact, formal, symbolic logic uses a language that looks rather like the math equality above, complete with its own operators and syntax. Premise two: and if the system is my bedroom. The ﬁrst of the set 2 syllogisms (inference of the rule from the case and the concluded result) can be perceived as what we called already a straight out inductive generalization, summing up from an example of beans to the number of beans in the bag. Three methods of reasoning are the deductive, inductive, and abductive approaches. Both of them are ampliative, which means that the conclusion goes totally beyond what is basically contained in the researched premises.